New code contributor index

Posted by David May 18, 2009 @ 03:42 PM

Xavier Noria (code) and José Espinal (design) have created an awesome code contributor index for Rails core submissions. It’s being updated automatically every night and tracks the number of commits and which particular commits to individuals in the community. You can even track the commits over time, as in who’s been most active this month.

The site now lives at contributors.rubyonrails.org. Thanks to Xavier and José for putting in the work on this!

16 comments

Comments

  1. Peter Cooper on 18 May 15:56:

    When I go to contributors.rubyonrails.org, it just reloads the front page of this blog again. Temporary virtual host issue? Or a DNS propagation delay? (I do get a diff IP for contributors. versus weblog. though)

  2. Vesa Nieminen on 18 May 16:04:

    Same thing for me. Only seeing blog front page.

  3. Grant Hutchins on 18 May 16:09:

    Looks like the DNS is still propagating. There is a wildcard entry that points to the blog it seems.

    I just went and cleared the OpenDNS cache, so hopefully that will help a lot of people see it faster.

  4. John on 18 May 16:21:

    FYI It seems to only count committers, not authors

  5. John on 18 May 16:23:

    FYI I’m wrong. :P

  6. Johannes on 18 May 16:44:

    Power law distribution!

  7. Xavier Noria on 18 May 16:54:

    @John yeah, and commit has many authors :)

  8. Ross on 18 May 19:30:

    Very cool. Now, open source the collaborators tool :). I’d love to hook this up to our project.

  9. Xavier Noria on 18 May 20:41:

    @Ross Sure it is at http://github.com/fxn/rails-contributors/tree/master.

  10. Matthew Rudy Jacobs on 19 May 01:56:

    I really like it, but I think the rankings are wrong.

    they should be cumulative,

    1. Mr A

    2. Ms B

    3. Dr C

    Sister D Revd E #6. Prof F

    Currently Prof F would be ranked 4th, which is wrong.

  11. Matthew Rudy Jacobs on 19 May 01:59:

    (that didnt come out so well)

    1. Mr A

    2. Ms B

    3. Dr C

    3. Sister D

    3. Revd E

    6. Prof F

    is correct

  12. Some Guy on 19 May 17:50:

    Wow, QUANTITY for the win!

    Why write in one line what you could write in 10!

  13. Xavier Noria on 19 May 19:09:

    @Matthew I think both series make sense, it just depends on how you define them. But I don’t really have a preference… it could be changed if people want to.

  14. John Topley on 19 May 19:16:

    I think what this really shows is that DHH has been slacking off for the past year… ;-)

  15. Sebastian A. Espindola on 19 May 23:08:

    Yay! I’m there with many others at position #52. Thanks for boosting my ego a little bit. :)

  16. Angeln Much on 21 May 18:31:

    nice thanks.